Description: We had to take pictures of four different types of portraits.
Analysis: The first is environmental, then candid. then formal, then faceless. Interpretation: There is no meaning. Judgement: I thought they were good. The formal was blurry but I thought it was alright.
2 Comments
Description: These are all pictures of framing.
Analysis: One picture is from the holes in the locker. Another was suppose to be the lines on a door. One is on a slippery cone. The next one is under the vending machine. The last is the fire extinguisher window. Interpretation: There is somewhat of a meaning. I was going for pictures that involve humor. Judgement: One of these pictures are not of framing. I thought I had the picture, but the lines of the frame did not appear. Description: These are pictures of forced perspective.
Analysis: I went around pinching everything because I thought it was funny. Interpretation: There is no meaning. Judgement: I do not like these photos because I could have done better but decided not too. Description: Pictures of black and white.
Analysis: Went through the woods and took pictures. Interpretation: There is no meaning. Judgement: All photos are good. Description: These pictures were all taken outside and the color are suppose to grab your attention
Analysis: These are all pictures of color. Interpretation: There isn't much of a meaning to these pictures. Judgement: I thought the pictures were alright. Most of them have distracting backgrounds. Description: These are all pictures of pattern.
Analysis: They all have a different design to them. Interpretation: I wish I could have gotten rid of the glare on the star one. Judgement: I thought these were successful because they all had a pattern to it. Description: These are all pictures of texture.
Analysis: They have rough and smooth texture. Interpretation: Its kind of hard to tell what the last picture is, but its grass. Judgement: I thought they were successful. Description: These are pictures of form.
Analysis: I tried to get the lightness and shadows to really show. Interpretation: There isn't much of a meaning except that it is form. Judgement: I thought the pictures were alright. Maybe if I found my own personal light and shined it at the objects. Description: Its pictures of Colby.
Analysis: I think they are funny. Interpretation: I thought I could take my time. Judgement: I thought it was alright. What do you think is the difference between "realism" and "photo realism" according to Erik Johansson?
When he thinks realism, he thinks photo realism. What are the 3 rules he has to create a realistic result? First rule is that photos combined should have the same perspective. Secondly, photos combined should have the same type of light. The third one is about making it impossible to distinguish where the different images begin and end by making it seamless. How does Erik plan for each one of his final photographs? A sketch |
|